-
David Botti
|
Nov 19, 2008 01:36 PM
Starting in mid-December this year new electric cars purchased by the Army will start arriving at U.S. bases for on-site use, the Military Times reports.
Joined by the Air Force and Navy, the Army is planning to receive 800
of these vehicles by next year with an ultimate goal of 10,000
overall. Paul Bollinger, deputy assistant Army secretary for energy
and partnerships, told the paper:
The Army is moving quickly; the purchase plans were unveiled in
October as part of the service’s ambitious new energy strategy, which
also calls for the construction of solar and geothermal facilities.
Bollinger,
citing General Services Administration figures, said each electric car
would use an average of about $400 in electricity per year, compared
with the roughly $2,400 in fuel needed to run a gas-powered car.
Moreover, the 4,000 electric cars will save 11.5 million gallons of
fuel per year, he said.
And
on whether Bollinger expects the purchase of so many electric cars by
all three military branches will affect the industry, he remarked:
“We are not going to buy enough to be a market maker, but we can be a
market initiator,” Bollinger said. “If we buy 10,000 of these vehicles,
piggyback that with perhaps 10,000 by the Air Force and 10,000 for the
Navy, that is 30,000 vehicles. Automobile manufacturers can then decide
if there is a market for these. We have at least created the market to
get something started.”
Bollinger
is part of the recently created Army Energy and Partnership Office
which, in part, looks to make military energy self-sufficient while
also cutting down on the overall consumption of energy. According to a recent article published
by the Army's own news service, Bollinger layed out the tactical need
for removing the military's dependence on the civilian power-grid:
"If we were attacked, or there was a terrible act of nature -- and our
Soldiers were called out into the community to either defend or protect
-- they need their installation operating," Bollinger said. "You also
have critical infrastructure there, hospitals, communications, you may
have munitions, and you may need electricity to pump fuel."
Energy security means that an Army installation can still provide power
to its most critical operations, even if the civilian power grid is
completely down. For the Army to accomplish that, it first needs to
know the total energy consumption of each installation as a baseline,
Bollinger said. It must determine the most important parts of the
mission that need to be powered. Those two pieces of information,
coupled with an effort to reduce energy usage through improved
efficiency, is how he said the Army plans to gain energy security on
its installations.
The article added:
Reducing energy usage and increasing energy efficiency on Army posts
are not enough to provide energy security, however. Army bases must
also be able to generate their own power for their most critical
missions, if called on to do so.
Developing facilities that can power the needs of the Army and at the
same time draw on renewable resources is something the Army isn't going
to tackle alone.
"This is a partnership with the private sector," Bollinger said. "We
are inviting them to come in and assist us in reaching our goal of
energy security. The Army is taking a leadership role and is committed
to making our installations energy secure and reducing greenhouse gas
emissions -- we call that smart energy."
For more on military environmental initiatives, read this post from early October, where we took a look at environmental concerns in Iraq and Afghanistan.
More
-
David Botti
|
Nov 13, 2008 02:54 PM
There have been two developments recently in the world of online video
that aim to convey U.S. military life in Iraq back to the home front --
though for much different purposes. On Monday the New York Times ran a short feature on the redesign of the U.S. Army Website,
where potential recruits can now view pared-down, YouTube-esque videos
of soldiers in Iraq talking about life there. As the Times reports,
the "Straight From Iraq Series," is intended to target the
17-24-year-old demographic using this more current technology. From
the paper:
The goal is to provide those considering the Army — along with
parents and others who influence their decisions — with “verifiable
information about what being a soldier is really like, what combat is
really like,” said Lt. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley, commanding general of
the Army Accessions Command in Fort Monroe, Va., which is overseeing
recruitment.
The changes in the “Army strong” campaign place
more emphasis on the Internet, event marketing and other methods that
connect with young Americans on a closer, more personal level...
...In addition to the new content on goarmy.com, there will be new TV
commercials, meant to help drive traffic to the Web site. The first
ones compare the Army to a company, a team and a school by showing
young men and women in settings like an office building, a gym and a
campus. The scenes shift into scenes of soldiers performing military
tasks like marching and saluting the flag.
A screen shot from goarmy.com.
Oh, and for those of you rodeo fans out there, here's some bad news:
To help pay for the new media features, cutbacks are being made in areas like the Army’s sponsorships of professional rodeos.
Elsewhere on the Internet, a new Website called TroopTube is up and running
allowing military members and family/friends to share videos. It may
seem along the same lines as YouTube's functionality, but in May 2007
the Defense Department blocked soldiers from accessing that Website
for, according to the Associated Press, "security and bandwidth
issues." TroopTube's homepage states that it is a Website authorized
by the Defense Department. The AP even highlights some interesting
technology built into the site:
But
the 4-month-old startup's real forte is making sure site searches turn
up the best video results. Delve's system turns a video's sound into a
text transcript. It pares unimportant words like "this" and "that,"
then compares what's left against a massive database of words commonly
uttered in proximity to each other, collected from crawling hundreds of
millions of Web pages.
The
result: Even if speech recognition software trips on the one word
someone is searching for, there's a good chance Delve can still deliver
relevant results.
More
-
David Botti
|
Oct 28, 2008 09:21 AM
A study released today by the VA's National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
found that 15 percent of the Iraq/Afghanistan vets seeking treatment at
VA facilities report experiencing some kind of sexual trauma while
serving in the military. Additionally, these veterans are 1.5 times
more likely require mental health care. These numbers are derived from
the nearly 40 percent of recent war veterans who've sought general
medical care since being discharged from the military. Screening all
vets coming through VA medical facilities for sexual trauma is a
standard practice.
Here are more statistics referenced in the report [via Reuters and USA Today]:|
- 76 percent of women who've had previous sexual trauma reported
mental health problems, 51 percent of which include some form of PTSD.
- 47 percent of women without a history of sexual trauma
reported mental health problems, 22 percent of which include some form
of PTSD.
- Women with military-related sexual trauma experiences have a 59 percent higher risk of mental health problems.
- Men with military-related sexual trauma experiences have a 40 percent higher risk of mental health problems.
- One in seven female vets reported an instance of military sexual trauma.
- Just under one percent of male vets reported an instance of military sexual trauma.
The study covered 125,000 veterans seeking treatment from the VA
between October 2001 and October 2007. Active duty soldiers were not
included because the VA is not involved with their care. Additionally,
the specific types of sexual trauma were not included, only the number
of occurrences.
Reuters spoke to the new report's co-author Rachel Kimerling:
Kimerling said in a telephone interview the term "military sexual
trauma" covers a range of events from coerced sex to outright rape or
threatening and unwelcome sexual advances...
..."If you think about military service where you are living and
working so closely with the same people, that even if it is not sexual
assault ... it is possible that severe sexual harassment is just as
traumatic," she said...
...Kimerling said that may mean many veterans are unaware they can be
helped and she said she hoped more would come forward to seek treatment.
"There are dedicated health care services for military sexual trauma at every VA facility across the nation," she said.
Sexual trauma can lead to depression, anxiety, substance abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder, Kimerling said.
"We know there are effective, evidence-based treatments for them that are used in VA," she added.
Additionally, USA Today wrote of the likelihood female service members will report sexual trauma at all:
Many women are afraid to report the assaults,
says Anita Sanchez of the Miles Foundation, a non-profit that provides
services to victims of military-related trauma. Fewer than a third of
women who come to Miles for help after sexual assaults say they've told
the military, she says.
"A typical scenario is it's either a supervisor
or someone at her level, in the same military unit. If you come
forward, you're tattle-telling on a comrade. Women have told me about
the sneers, the sarcastic comments. They can find themselves
ostracized," says Sanchez, and when other women see this, the lesson
isn't lost on them.
For a detailed introduction to military sexual trauma read this post from last year where I interviewed an expert on the subject.
More
-
David Botti
|
Oct 8, 2008 09:25 AM
A roundup of military and veterans stories worth taking a look at:
Five
U.S. Marine Corps humvees seized by Russian forces when they entered
Georgia earlier this summer still haven't been returned:
The Humvees were taken Aug. 19 during Russia’s assault on the Georgian
port of Poti, said Lt. Cmdr. Corey Barker, a spokesman for U.S.
European Command. The vehicles were in Georgia awaiting commercial
transport back to the U.S. following Operation Immediate Response, a
multinational training exercise in July involving Georgian and U.S.
forces. [Marine Corps Times]
Last
week New York Magazine went down to the iconic Times Square recruiting
station in New York City for some Q & A with new Army recruits on
their way to boot camp. The interviews were spurred by news the Army
has passed its recruiting goals for the past three years. The magazine
described its subjects as: "four local boys and one Goth girl from
Alabama in New York for the first time, all ages 17 to 23." Excerpt:
Chris Biener, 21, Bohemia, Long Island:
New York: So you leave for Army Reserves boot camp next Monday. What'll you do until then?
CB: Hang out with some friends.
New York: What have you been doing up to now?
CB: I went to Stonybrook University and played
football there for the first semester, then I went to Suffolk Community
College, then I started working and going to school, back and forth,
then I decided to do this.
New York: Why didn't you stay in college?
CB: I kept switching my major, which kept putting me back. So I worked at a swimming-pool store.
New York: Why are you joining the military?
CB: I almost did it straight out of high school, but my parents wanted me to go to college. I always wanted to join growing up.
New York: Why?
CB: I've always played sports, but there's no team after high school. So this is a big team to join.
New York: What's your big dream?
CB: I'm going to be an LPN, a nurse. So when I get out
[of the military], I know I'll get a good job. And if I stay in,
there'll always be people who need help.
New York: We're in two wars right now. You may go and be seriously physically or mentally damaged or die. Does that affect your decision?
CB: I used to think about it, but then I realized I'll
be trained enough to probably get away from that situation, so if it
happens, it happens.
New York: How would you characterize the situation [in Iraq] right now?
CB: We should be there, but the people don't want us there. It's kind of up in the air.
New York: Should we reinstitute the draft?
CB: No, I think the turnout's positive enough with
volunteer people. With a draft you have an Army with people who don't
want to be there. If it's volunteer, you'll get 100 percent out of all
of them.
New York: Would you pick Iraq or Afghanistan to be deployed to?
CB: Iraq. There seems to be more going on. It'd be more fun. As a nurse, there'd be more jobs for me to do.
[Daily Intel]
A
Jewish Army recruit has been transferred to a new training battalion
after his involvement in incidents of verbal and physical harassment by
other recruits and drill sergeants over his religion. The military is
not providing a specific reason for why the recruit was transferred,
though his father told the Associated Press it was because his son
didn't feel safe.
Handman began basic training Aug. 29 at Fort Benning in Columbus. He
soon wrote a letter to his parents in which he said, “I have just never
been so discriminated against/humiliated about my religion.” He told
them he feared for his safety.
Handman’s parents contacted U.S.
Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., who forwarded their concerns to the Army.
Four days after commanders interviewed Handman about being harassed, he
was beaten in a laundry room near his barracks and treated at the Army
post’s hospital.
Manganaro said investigators don’t believe
religious bigotry was the motive for Handman being attacked, though she
could not explain why...The investigation of Handman’s allegations of harassment found that one
drill sergeant had ordered Handman to remove his yarmulke, which he
wore with his uniform, as he ate in a dining hall. Another had called
him “Juden,” the German word for Jews. [AP]
A new campaign ad by the group VoteVets
criticizes Sen. John McCain for skipping a crucial GI Bill vote. In
the ad the veteran remarks: "Vet to vet, Senator McCain. When you put
money from your rich friends ahead of vets like me how is that country
first?"
A few weeks ago I posted a pro-McCain ad featuring a wounded Iraq veteran.
I'm reposting it here for you to compare how veterans from two
different ways of thinking voice support for their respective
candidates.
The widow of an
Iraq veteran who committed suicide after returning from the war is
suing the federal government for negligence. The deceased veteran,
Donald Woodward, 23, made three suicide attempts and was seeking
treatment at a VA hospital. His wife said VA doctors were slow to
diagnose her husband's psychiatric condition and did not schedule
follow-up visits. Woodward, at the time, was in VA out-patient care
for depression.
"I intend to make them make changes," said his mother, Lori
Woodward. "I have too many friends whose kids are in Iraq. I have a
nephew now in Iraq, in the same unit, and I can't have my family go
through this again."
Alison Aikele, a VA spokeswoman in Washington, said the agency does not typically comment on pending litigation. [AP]
More
-
David Botti
|
Sep 11, 2008 12:39 PM
It used to be that the term "forgotten" was often applied to the war in
Afghanistan, at least in comparison to the stream of news coming out of
Iraq during the past few years. Now, as Iraq quiets, troop shifts to
Afghanistan are planned for the near future, and the media once again
devotes more column inches to that conflict, word comes of a new
milestone: 2008 is the deadliest year for U.S. forces in Afghanistan
since the 2001 invasion.
The Associated Press reports that two
U.S. soldiers were killed today, the seventh anniversary of the 9/11
attacks, bringing 2008's death toll to 113, passing the 111 U.S.
soldiers killed there last year. At the same time, 33,000 U.S. troops
are currently operating in Afghanistan; the most since 2001. As the
two latest U.S. deaths are still recent, there are few details available:
The NATO-led force said one soldier was killed when insurgents attacked
a compound. The separate U.S.-led coalition said a second service
member died in combat. No other details were released, but a Western
military official told The Associated Press that both troops were
American.
Yesterday
the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael G. Mullen, told
congress that NATO forces are running out of time in Afghanistan and
attention needs to be given to Pakistan's tribal areas along with the
border. His testimony came as U.S. forces are openly conducting
cross-border raids into Pakistan, which is drawing condemnation from that country's government. From the LA Times:
Mullen said the new strategy for Afghanistan must focus on more than
just increasing troop strength. He noted that existing provincial
reconstruction teams did not have enough agricultural, educational and
judicial experts. The U.S. must focus on boosting foreign investment
and improving governance in Afghanistan, he said.
"We can't kill our way to victory," Mullen said.
Mullen said he was not convinced the U.S. and its allies were winning in Afghanistan but said he believed victory was possible.
There's been scant coverage of day-to-day U.S.
military operations in Afghanistan, but still there is some quality
work out there. The UK Guardian has this interactive piece following U.S. and British soldiers in various regions of the country. The paper also has a striking series of videos riding along with a U.S. Army Medevac helicopter crew. There was also this frightening and candid New York Times Magazine piece following a unit of soldiers operating in the volatile Korengal Valley.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 23, 2008 04:58 PM
Just a quick note to let you know the White House gave word today of a
new Medal of Honor recipient. Nineteen-year-old Army Pfc. Ross
McGinnis was killed in late-2006 when he jumped on a grenade to save
his comrades. From the Associated Press:
McGinnis was perched in the gunner's hatch of a Humvee when a grenade
sailed past him and into the truck where four other soldiers sat. He
shouted a warning to the others, then jumped on the grenade. The
grenade, which was lodged near the vehicle's radio, blew up and killed
him.
McGinnis is the fourth service member to received the Medal of Honor for service in Iraq.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 19, 2008 09:15 AM
Late last week a U.S. Army soldier stood in the rotunda of the Cannon
House Office Building and announced during a press conference that he's
now refusing orders for deployment to Iraq. Sergeant Matthis Chiroux,
who served as a military photojournalist, gave his statement soon after
a number of anti-war veterans testified before Congress -- the first
time such veterans have done so. AFP gave this account of the hearing:
Former army sergeant Kristofer Goldsmith told the landmark
hearing
of "lawless murders, looting and the abuse of countless Iraqis." He
spoke of the psychologically fragile men and women who return from Iraq
to find little help or treatment offered from official circles.
Goldsmith said he had "self-medicated" for several months to treat the
wounds of the war...Another
soldier told AFP he had to boost his medication to treat anxiety and
social agoraphobia -- two of many lingering mental wounds he carries
since his deployments in Iraq -- before testifying. A group of
veterans in the
packed hearing room gazed blankly as their comrades' testimonies
shattered the official version that the U.S. effort in Iraq is
succeeding. Almost to a man, the testifiers denounced serious flaws in
the chain of command in Iraq.
As for Sgt. Chiroux, he said his position as a military journalist
gave exposed him to countless disturbing stories he was afraid to
publish for fear of retribution by the Army. He arrived in Washington,
D.C. with Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW),
which coordinated the testimonies before Congress. Below is a video of
Chiroux's speech, where he also said he will remain in the U.S. despite
the great number of war resistors who move to Canada.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 13, 2008 12:53 PM
News roundup:
*Bill Ardolino of The Long War Journal takes his readers along on a night patrol with U.S. soldiers and members of a Baghdad neighborhood watch called Sons of Iraq:
Co-founded seven months ago by local leaders and members of the 82nd
Airborne, the Al Sadria branch of the neighborhood watch is composed of
about 250 members who are paid by and coordinate with American units.
The branch is responsible for a series of predominantly Shia
neighborhoods in central Baghdad that include part of the Shorja
Market. Though leader Faris Abdul-Hassan refers to his group as “the
first Shia Awakening” against criminals and terrorists, he refuses to
hire anyone with sectarian allegiances.
According to Ardolino, with a decrease in the
number of U.S. troops, the Sons of Iraq have been successful in
shouldering the burden of peacekeeping in their own section of
Baghdad. While the final goal is integration with the Iraqi police,
many in the Sons of Iraq are weary of high infiltration rates within
the police by members of the Mahdi Army. See a photo slideshow of the patrol here.
*The Marine Corps Times reports
that the Navy plans to expand the number of mobile psychiatric teams
embedded within Marine units. A bit of context: the Marine Corps
doesn't have its own medical services, but rather relies on the Navy to
provide personnel (the Marine Corps is part of the Department of the
Navy). The units, known as Navy Operational Stress Control and
Readiness (or OSCAR), should number at 23 within two years. The
purpose is to provide initial psychiatric counseling to Marines while
they are still serving out in the field:
“We want to put mental health professionals with our small-unit
leaders,” Navy Surgeon General Vice Adm. Adam Robinson said. “We think
if we can train them there. Tere’s a real synergy that can come. We can
be there to help with treatment, training and surveillance.”
*One doesn't see much reporting out of Basra these days, but the New York Times Baghdad Bureau blog has an interesting piece today.
An Iraqi member of the Times staff took a four-day reporting trip to
Basra to see just what the situation is there. Some selections:
I stopped for a while and I saw many Iraqi Army cars riddled with
bullets. I saw troops deployed everywhere I looked: on the roof of
every high building, every road intersection, occupying government
offices that before were occupied by political factions.
I was shocked when I saw traces of the fight, which was clear on the buildings close to the main streets.
As an Iraqi from the south who knows exactly what was going on, with
the militias controlling everything in particular cities or ports, I
did not expect that the Iraqi forces – which are majority Shia - would
be able to confront the militia influence.
There was a new feeling. I had never seen before the Iraq Army,
without hesitation, accusing the Mahdi Army of being involved in all
the disorder there.
One of the soldiers told me: “The Mahdi Army are a group of criminals, they will destroy everything if we don’t stop them.”
In the past, I have never seen soldiers dare to say anything about
them. I felt the reign of fear is broken, and that is it. Exactly the
same feeling as when the Baathist regime fell.
*Military.com recently posted an article taking a look at the rise in per capita income within military communities:
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could be behind the jumps in income,
according to experts. Combat pay and re-enlistment bonuses for
professional soldiers, combined with the activation of National Guard
and Reserve units, put more money in the bank accounts of personnel
shipping out of Fort Bragg, said David G. Lenze of the U.S. Commerce
Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis, which issued the income data.
According
to the piece, in North Carolina two major military communities ranked
first and second in areas of the state with the highest per capita
growth. The first of these, the Fort Bragg area, saw personal income
rise more than $8,900 over five years. Military towns in Georgia and
Tennessee saw these numbers rise by between 35 and 37 percent.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 9, 2008 01:58 PM
Though he was killed in Afghanistan in 2004, Pat Tillman's death is
still a subject of controversy and tremendous reflection. Tillman, you
will recall, was the NFL player turned Army Ranger who was originally
said to have died under enemy fire (he was awarded the Silver Star),
but later reports found he was killed by friendly fire.
Now his
mother, Mary, has published a book in which she charges that former
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew about the cover-up over the
details of her son's death. As she writes [via MSNBC]:
“... I believe Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew Pat was killed
by fratricide and permitted the cover-up. It is not
believable that a man known for his propensity to micromanage would not
want to know what happened to his most high-profile soldier. I informed
the committee that Pat received a personal letter from Rumsfeld shortly
after he and his brother enlisted, commending him for his commitment to
serve. Pat was obviously in Rumsfeld's consciousness."
During a recent 60 Minutes interview,
Katie Couric questioned Army Secretary Pete Geren over the alterations
of eyewitness accounts of Tillman's death used for his Silver Star
citation. She asked if he knew who manipulated the statements, and he
replied:
"Well, that's one of the questions that we will never completely
answer. But it certainly is one of the areas that
that raises questions. There are so many mistakes. So many things that
happened. If you add them all together, it certainly calls into
question the credibility of those who handled this. And raises the kind
of questions that Ms. Tillman raises. I don't blame her for that. And I
don't expect her ever to believe us. But there was no effort to
deceive. There were mistakes and grievous errors by the legions. And as
a result, we fell short of our duty to her as a mother of one of our
heroes."
Over at the IAVA blog,
Perry Jefferies takes issue with Sec. Geren's uncertainty, saying that
the process for awarding medals should clearly indicate who writes a
citation:
Only a certain amount of people handle the citation
for the Silver Star, one of our highest military awards. Each commander
signs a block on the document and there is a document called a
transmittal letter that accompanies it from office to office. Only
organizational will prevents the Army from prosecuting the criminal
that a) faked an official document and b) tried to leave a lower grade
enlisted Soldier to take the blame.
If indeed the medal was awarded under dishonest conditions, should it still stand? A letter to the Arizona Republic newspaper took this stance:
The awarding of the decoration was illegal, as
the incident obviously
didn't represent "gallantry in action against an armed enemy," as
required by the Army's own regulations. This award does a disservice
to all of our veterans who have legitimately earned this august award.
The Tillman family should return the award to the Army, which should
then rescind the award as unjustified and issued illegally.
Another reader then responded:
Yes, it may be true that this star represents "gallantry in action
against an armed enemy." What could be more gallant than a young man
giving up not only his career but his life? Pat Tillman gave up his life to serve in an illegal war that has ruined
our economy with the billions of dollars being wasted but, more
important, the loss of the respect of the rest of the world.
In the New York Times' look at Mary Tillman's new book, there's an interesting historical note of other athletes who've been killed in action.
Eddie Grant, the Giants’
third baseman, died in France in 1918. Christy Mathewson, the great
Giants pitcher, had his life shortened from a mustard-gas accident in
training near the end of World War I. And Nile Kinnick, the star
running back from Iowa, died in a training flight in 1943. But Pat
Tillman’s death was different because of the way he was used,
posthumously, blatantly.
You can read a Newsweek Q&A with Mary Tillman here.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 8, 2008 02:52 PM
A war of words began recently between writer Stephen King and a
conservative blogger over remarks King made about literacy and the U.S.
Army. During an appearance at the Library of Congress last month King said:
"I don't want to sound like an ad, a public service ad on TV, but the
fact is if you can read, you can walk into a job later on. If you
don't, then you've got the Army, Iraq, I don't know, something like
that. It's not as bright."
Blogger Noel Sheppard of the Website NewsBusters: Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias, criticized King
and likened his words to those of John Kerry when he said in 2006 that
having a poor education would get someone stuck in Iraq. Sheppard
wrote further: "Nice sentiment when the nation is at war, Stephen."
After Sheppard's blog post appeared, King countered on his own Website:
I guess he also feels that the war in Iraq has
nationwide approval.
Well, it doesn’t have mine. It is a waste of national resources...and
that includes the youth and blood of the 4,000 American troops who
have lost their lives there and for the tens of thousands who have been
wounded. I live in a national guard town, and I support our troops, but
I don’t support either the war or educational policies that limit the
options of young men and women to any one career—military or otherwise.
King further instructed readers of his website to email Sheppard with the words: “Hi, Noel—Stephen King says to shut up and I agree.”
According to the Associated Press, the U.S. Army released a statement yesterday responding to King's remarks:
"America's soldiers are proudly serving and fighting for us all. We can
be proud of our soldiers' selfless service, their skill and their
ingenuity. They certainly are role models for every high-school student
in America considering a noble career...and many book authors."
Just
as John Kerry's 2006 remarks sparked the ire of veterans and average
citizens alike, King has found himself the subject some negative
blogging since Sheppard's original post. One commenter for the
original post did offer a point of view from the middle ground:
I actually don't think King meant to insult the troops. He made a
mistake of trotting out an outdated draft-era notion about the military
to prove a totally different point. But he compounded his error by
lashing out at those who pointed out his mistake. Now it's a "thing" in
the media, and he's not looking very good, or smart.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 6, 2008 10:36 AM
There's been some pointed discussions lately over the future of West Point cadet Caleb Campbell,
who was a seventh round NFL draft pick of the Detroit Lions late last
month. While many of his classmates may be deploying to Iraq and
Afghanistan in the future, Campbell will (if he makes the roster) do
recruiting and PR events for the Army during the offseason. The Army's
point of view is that Campbell can use his NFL status in a unique way
to help the service. The New York Times provides the Army's official policy:
Any member of the Army with an
exceptional skill who could provide recruiting and public affairs
benefits to the Army could be assigned to the nearest recruiting unit
for their two-year active-duty period. Those approved can participate
in their professional activity — in Campbell’s case, pro football — as
long as it does not interfere with military duties. Then they can apply
for early release from active duty.
Campbell also described to the Times how he came to the decision to pursue football:
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 25, 2008 03:03 PM
The Air Force Times reported today
that the bankruptcy of a civilian airline under contract to provide
flights for the military is delaying homecoming for some troops. ATA
shut down the day after filing for bankruptcy on April 2--the airline's
second bankruptcy in nearly three years. An army spokesman told the AF
Times that troops could expect delays of two to six days for the next
several weeks.
ATA was part of the FedEx Teaming Arrangement, a
group of airlines contracted by the military to transport troops and
their families overseas. The Indianapolis Star reported on the circumstances of the local air carrier's demise:
Hampered by unprofitable routes, ATA lost $75 million last year and was
in talks with five potential suitors when FedEx, with apparently little
explanation, decided to cut off the Indianapolis carrier's only money
maker: military charters...Its roots were passenger charters that led the carrier, earlier known
as American Trans Air, to branch out into troop charters. ATA operates
a $340 million-a-year airborne bus line ferrying troops and their
families to and from places where the U.S. military stations troops
worldwide.
Back on the home front, military families awaiting the return of their stranded loved ones are speaking out. The Hartford Courant has the story of one father who reached out to his old college roommate, Miramax Films co-founder Harvey Weinstein, for help:
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 22, 2008 11:25 AM
The army announced yesterday that the practice of "stop-loss," where a
solider is held past his/her enlistment contract, should continue for
at least another year. While military leaders are making efforts to
reduce combat tour lengths, and increase the size of the army, the Associated Press reports
there are roughly 12,000 soldiers serving under the stop-loss. The
numbers break down to: "6,800 active-duty Army, about 3,800 in the Army
National Guard and close to 1,500 in the Reserves."
USA Today breaks down the numbers even further, putting the latest stop-loss news into a wider historical context:
-In May 2007 the practice of stop-loss reached a three-year low of 8,540.
-"Since then, the number of soldiers forced to remain in the Army rose 43% to 12,235 in March."
-"Soldiers affected by stop loss now serve, on average, an extra 6.6
months...Key leaders at the
small-unit level — sergeants through sergeants first class — make up
45% of those soldiers. Soldiers typically enlist for four-year stints."
-58,300 soldiers have been affected by the stop-loss since 2002.
People have often asked me what exactly a stop-loss is --
especially after they hear it referred to as the "back door draft."
First, USA Today offers this concise summary of how the army views the
policy: "Stop loss can keep a soldier in the service if his or her unit
deploys
within 90 days of the end of the soldier's commitment. It is necessary,
the Army says, to maintain the integrity of units headed to war."
Second,
I sometimes use the example of my own unit on the eve of the invasion
into Iraq back in 2003. Most of us in my reserve unit enlisted under a
six-year contract. That meant that for six years were would actively
train with our home unit, and be subject to mobilizations if ordered by
the president. Afterwards, we would spend two years in the Inactive
Ready Reserve (IRR) during which time we would not train, but would
still "be on the books," in case the military needed more troops.
In
March 2003, when my unit got word it was heading to Iraq, a number of
marines were reaching the end of their six-year contract. Depending on
how long we stayed in Iraq, their contract might end while they were
over there. It was these marines who were subject to stop-loss. They
were senior members of the unit whose experience would be invaluable
during the deployment, and our company would be hurt if our numbers
decreased. So, they stayed and deployed with us; then left the
military after returning home.
Most did not complain about
serving past their enlistment contract. Their buddies were going to
war, and the stop-loss marines wanted to go with them -- and, at that
point, the war was still new. Many felt they'd miss out on a major
historical event that would go down in the history books. But, times
have changed, and the war is more than five years old. As James
Martin, a social work professor at Bryn Mawr College and retired Army
colonel, told USA Today: "These are the guys who bear the brunt of it.
They just get put back into the grinder continually."
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 17, 2008 01:22 PM
A new comprehensive report
by the RAND Corporation has concluded that 300,000 veterans of Iraq and
Afghanistan suffer from depression or PTSD--and only about half have
sought out treatment, according to the Associated Press.
The report surveyed 1,965 vets in what the AP calls the first large
scale private study of its kind. The numbers show that 18.5 percent of
all Iraq and Afghanistan vets suffer from these these symptoms.
According to RAND, possible solutions to temper these problems may be
available:
Among our recommendations is that effective treatments documented in the scientific literature — evidence-based care
— are available for PTSD and major depression. Delivery of such care to
all veterans with PTSD or major depression would pay for itself within
two years, or even save money, by improving productivity and reducing
medical and mortality costs. Such care may also be a cost-effective way
to retain a ready and healthy military force for the future. However,
to ensure that this care is delivered requires system-level changes
across the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs,
and the U.S. health care system.
The AP offered up more conclusions drawn from the study, including why vets are not seeking care:
They gave various reasons for not getting help, including that they
worried about the side effects of medication; believe family and
friends could help them with the problem, or that they feared seeking
care might damage their careers.
The
report also noted who is most susceptible to depression and PTSD,
although, in the end, it is a vet's exposure to combat trauma that is
the greatest predictor:
Rates of PTSD and major depression were highest among Army soldiers and
Marines, and among service members who were no longer on active duty
(people in the reserves and those who had been discharged or retired
from the military). Women, Hispanics and enlisted personnel all were
more likely to report symptoms of PTSD and major depressions.
Last November the Pentagon opened the Defense
Center of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain
Injury in an effort to bring together education, treatment, and
research. From the Department of Defense:
The center also will set standards and
assess, survey and validate DoD programs, and decide, in part, how
resources are directed... Center officials are
reviewing hundreds of research project proposals that hope to claim a
piece of the $300 million set aside by Congress last year for brain
injury research. The office also will work with the military services
to see which of the many programs funded with another $600 million from
Congress are working and how to direct those funds to programs most
beneficial to servicemembers and families.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 16, 2008 01:49 PM
A selection of military news stories over the recent days:
The Associated Press reports
on troubles with training the Iraqi Navy and Marine Corps, and cites
recent issues with Iraqi Army troops fighting in Basra as indicative of
the overall training situation. As the rebuilt Iraqi navy is tasked
with defending the country's two vital oil platforms, the AP tells of a
disconnect between the reality of the situation and how it is perceived
by the navy recruits:
The day when Iraq alone can defend its shores — and protect its critical offshore oil installations — seems remote.
Iraq’s
navy now has five Chinese-made patrol boats and 26 fast-attack aluminum
vessels — fewer than half of which are operational. Its personnel
number about 1,350, including 350 Marines.
“They think they are
an elite unit, but they are not,” said Capt. Jock Alexander of the
British Royal Marines, who is in charge of training Iraqi Marines to
guard the 1.8-mile exclusion zone around each of the country’s two oil
platforms.
The struggle to build a credible Iraqi navy is
mirrored — on larger scales — by the mounting delays and costs to form
a new Iraqi army and air force after Washington disbanded Saddam
Hussein’s military.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports
on a series of grass-roots efforts aimed at joining Iraq veterans in
need with U.S. citizens ready to help. Among the programs are an
upcoming online forum of therapists around the country who've offered
their services to treating Iraq veterans. Many of these therapists
have committed one hour of free counseling to Iraq vets per week, for
as long as they wish. Then there's a series of Websites dedicated to
linking vets with people willing to donate money for basic
necessities. Still, the VA is hesitant to get on board with these
groups:
While Veterans Affairs
officials appreciate the support of community groups like Bobrow's,
they're careful about embracing them. Because of privacy regulations,
the VA can't disclose who has used their services. Often, VA employees
are reluctant to even hand out flyers from fledgling groups until
thoroughly checking them out.
"The veterans and their families have suffered enough. So when they
put up a public profile or say they need help, we want to make sure
they don't get injured again," said Patricia Matthews, a spokeswoman
for the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Center.
In a profile of Elise Forbes Tripp,
author of "Surviving Iraq: Soldiers' Stories," the Portsmouth Herald
News details some of her most interesting findings through interviews
with Iraq vets, including this one:
She was surprised at the men being upset at
having women in their units. "I would get long responses about how
useless women are in war ...; not sexist but how they don't belong
there."
Men said they created sexual tension
and diverted attention. They require involvement from male colleagues
for their safety, for example, having to guard their showers or to calm
them during a difficult time. "And I think they felt it was unfair that
woman could get pregnant and go home," she says. "I was just listening,
thinking this is amazing."
The New York Times reports that Donald Rumsfeld is set to pen his own memoir:
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
who resigned as secretary of defense in late 2006, will write his
memoirs for the Sentinel imprint of Penguin Group USA. Mr. Rumsfeld,
75, will cover not only his years in the Bush administration but also
his experiences with Presidents Richard M. Nixon, Gerald R. Ford and Ronald Reagan;
his work in the private sector; and his early life. In contrast to
other recent political figures who have produced memoirs, Mr. Rumsfeld
is forgoing an advance and will donate profits to a nonprofit
foundation he recently established to make educational grants to young
people interested in public service and establishing links between the
United States and Central Asia.
The Marine Corps Times reports
that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is proposing new measures that
would provide homes for severely injured veterans on VA property. The
proposal came during a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee
hearing where issues of long-term veterans care were raised. Sen.
Feinstein cited VA property in West Los Angeles that includes 300 acres
of undeveloped land:
Feinstein said she offered VA’s West LA campus as an example because
she often visits the site, but she believes such housing also could be
built at other VA facilities around the country.
Feinstein and
other California lawmakers have been trying to block VA from leasing
out the unused land for commercial purposes, but they have not agreed
on what to do with the property. Some want the land to be public park
land, some have proposed building housing for homeless veterans and
others have talked about leaving it completely undeveloped so it can be
used by future generations.
More