-
David Botti
|
Oct 10, 2008 10:05 AM
-
David Botti
|
Oct 8, 2008 09:25 AM
A roundup of military and veterans stories worth taking a look at:
Five
U.S. Marine Corps humvees seized by Russian forces when they entered
Georgia earlier this summer still haven't been returned:
The Humvees were taken Aug. 19 during Russia’s assault on the Georgian
port of Poti, said Lt. Cmdr. Corey Barker, a spokesman for U.S.
European Command. The vehicles were in Georgia awaiting commercial
transport back to the U.S. following Operation Immediate Response, a
multinational training exercise in July involving Georgian and U.S.
forces. [Marine Corps Times]
Last
week New York Magazine went down to the iconic Times Square recruiting
station in New York City for some Q & A with new Army recruits on
their way to boot camp. The interviews were spurred by news the Army
has passed its recruiting goals for the past three years. The magazine
described its subjects as: "four local boys and one Goth girl from
Alabama in New York for the first time, all ages 17 to 23." Excerpt:
Chris Biener, 21, Bohemia, Long Island:
New York: So you leave for Army Reserves boot camp next Monday. What'll you do until then?
CB: Hang out with some friends.
New York: What have you been doing up to now?
CB: I went to Stonybrook University and played
football there for the first semester, then I went to Suffolk Community
College, then I started working and going to school, back and forth,
then I decided to do this.
New York: Why didn't you stay in college?
CB: I kept switching my major, which kept putting me back. So I worked at a swimming-pool store.
New York: Why are you joining the military?
CB: I almost did it straight out of high school, but my parents wanted me to go to college. I always wanted to join growing up.
New York: Why?
CB: I've always played sports, but there's no team after high school. So this is a big team to join.
New York: What's your big dream?
CB: I'm going to be an LPN, a nurse. So when I get out
[of the military], I know I'll get a good job. And if I stay in,
there'll always be people who need help.
New York: We're in two wars right now. You may go and be seriously physically or mentally damaged or die. Does that affect your decision?
CB: I used to think about it, but then I realized I'll
be trained enough to probably get away from that situation, so if it
happens, it happens.
New York: How would you characterize the situation [in Iraq] right now?
CB: We should be there, but the people don't want us there. It's kind of up in the air.
New York: Should we reinstitute the draft?
CB: No, I think the turnout's positive enough with
volunteer people. With a draft you have an Army with people who don't
want to be there. If it's volunteer, you'll get 100 percent out of all
of them.
New York: Would you pick Iraq or Afghanistan to be deployed to?
CB: Iraq. There seems to be more going on. It'd be more fun. As a nurse, there'd be more jobs for me to do.
[Daily Intel]
A
Jewish Army recruit has been transferred to a new training battalion
after his involvement in incidents of verbal and physical harassment by
other recruits and drill sergeants over his religion. The military is
not providing a specific reason for why the recruit was transferred,
though his father told the Associated Press it was because his son
didn't feel safe.
Handman began basic training Aug. 29 at Fort Benning in Columbus. He
soon wrote a letter to his parents in which he said, “I have just never
been so discriminated against/humiliated about my religion.” He told
them he feared for his safety.
Handman’s parents contacted U.S.
Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., who forwarded their concerns to the Army.
Four days after commanders interviewed Handman about being harassed, he
was beaten in a laundry room near his barracks and treated at the Army
post’s hospital.
Manganaro said investigators don’t believe
religious bigotry was the motive for Handman being attacked, though she
could not explain why...The investigation of Handman’s allegations of harassment found that one
drill sergeant had ordered Handman to remove his yarmulke, which he
wore with his uniform, as he ate in a dining hall. Another had called
him “Juden,” the German word for Jews. [AP]
A new campaign ad by the group VoteVets
criticizes Sen. John McCain for skipping a crucial GI Bill vote. In
the ad the veteran remarks: "Vet to vet, Senator McCain. When you put
money from your rich friends ahead of vets like me how is that country
first?"
A few weeks ago I posted a pro-McCain ad featuring a wounded Iraq veteran.
I'm reposting it here for you to compare how veterans from two
different ways of thinking voice support for their respective
candidates.
The widow of an
Iraq veteran who committed suicide after returning from the war is
suing the federal government for negligence. The deceased veteran,
Donald Woodward, 23, made three suicide attempts and was seeking
treatment at a VA hospital. His wife said VA doctors were slow to
diagnose her husband's psychiatric condition and did not schedule
follow-up visits. Woodward, at the time, was in VA out-patient care
for depression.
"I intend to make them make changes," said his mother, Lori
Woodward. "I have too many friends whose kids are in Iraq. I have a
nephew now in Iraq, in the same unit, and I can't have my family go
through this again."
Alison Aikele, a VA spokeswoman in Washington, said the agency does not typically comment on pending litigation. [AP]
More
-
David Botti
|
Sep 26, 2008 02:04 PM
Now that tonight's presidential debate can count on both candidates
showing up, there's some speculation over what will actually be
debated. Originally the focus was intended to be on foreign policy,
but with the economy dominating headlines there's the possibility
things could change. The New York Times this morning quoted debate moderator Jim Lehrer as writing via e-mail: “I am not restrained from asking questions about the financial crisis. Stay tuned!”
How
much attention is given to Iraq (and perhaps veterans) is still up in
the air but that doesn't mean people aren't talking. Even as Iraq
remains largely absent from the front pages around the country, there's
a number of stories out there tackling politics, Iraq, and veterans
reactions to it all. But first let's take a look at what some vets are
saying about the debate. John Soltz, a veteran and co-founder of
VoteVets.org, lists five main points he believes vets of Iraq and Afghanistan will look to be addressed by both candidates:
1) Will the candidates (and the moderator) note the difference
between "tactical" success of the surge, versus the overall strategic
goal of the surge, and whether that was a success?
2) Will the candidates be challenged on the deteriorating
situation with Pakistan? Will Obama hold to his position that we must
act to strike terrorists officially inside Pakistan's borders, and will
McCain hold to his view that Obama is wrong to strike in the ungoverned
parts of Pakistan without the expressed consent from Islamabad?
3) Will the candidates speak about our inability to take care of our current military commitments, let alone new ones?
4) Will the candidates lay out what steps short of military action they would take to prevent a nuclear Iran?
5) Given news that Prime Minister Maliki has hinted that he
prefers a timeline that removes troops by 2010, but was pressured to
accept a 2011 timeline due to U.S. political considerations, will the
candidates consider moving a timeline to exit Iraq back to 2010, or do
they consider that unrealistic?
Perhaps the candidate's respective answers to the first question
may prove to be the most revealing (should the question come up). The
answers would reveal their ability to break past the restrictions of
these catch phrases and explain how well they're able understand how
nuanced the situation in Iraq can be. Tactics and strategy, while they
go hand in hand, are most certainly not exclusive barometers of success
or failure. There's no way to tell exactly what veterans as a whole
will use to judge the debate, but it's pretty safe to say that the
questions Soltz lists are on the minds of most American's as well.
Even
though Gov. Sarah Palin seems to have monopolized vice-presidential
candidate coverage, Sen. Joe Biden made an interesting proposal on
Monday before a Baltimore convention of National Guardsmen. Citing
that vast number of National Guard members serving in Iraq and
Afghanistan, Biden said a representative of this branch should sit on
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The Associated Press reports on Biden's comments and one Guard general's reaction:
"Tell me why there's any rational reason why you shouldn't have a
seat at that table," Biden said, speaking one day after Republican
presidential candidate John McCain addressed the group.
Maj. Gen. Frank Vavala, adjutant general of Biden's home state of
Delaware and president of the Adjutants General Association of the
United States, said such recognition, similar to that given the Marine
Corps after initial representation by the Navy, is long overdue.
"It's something that we certainly are advocating as an association,"
said Vavala, who noted that more than a third of the Army and Air Force
consists of National Guard units, and that the Guard numbers almost
500,000 men and women.
"Our people are fighting the war every day," he said, adding that
the notion of Guardsmen as "weekend warriors" no longer applies.
Biden's eldest son, Delaware attorney general Beau Biden, is a
captain in a National Guard unit that is to report for training next
month before being deployed to Iraq.
An op-ed writer for the Indianapolis Star takes note of an unpublished opinion piece penned by a member of Iraqi parliament,
Sami al-Askari, who expresses his support for John McCain. The
argument is based mainly on that fear that Obama will prematurely
withdraw troops from Iraq. He also says that Iraqis and Republicans
have come to understand each other over the years of war, and an influx
of Democrat-minded policy decisions could set back whatever progress
has been made:
As the presidential election draws near -- and partly in response to
Obama's selection of Joe Biden as his running mate -- Askari apparently
has softened his rhetoric on the U.S. presence.
He still favors
withdrawal of U.S. forces by the end of 2011, as proposed in the
security treaty. And he figures that the deadline will be honored by
whoever wins, if only for the sake of the 2012 American elections.
But
changing now from a Republican to a Democratic administration would be
problematic, he says -- not least because Obama has said the U.S.
Congress should be involved in any status-of-forces agreement with Iraq.
Askari
also expressed concern about Biden's 2007 plan to divide Iraq into
three semi-autonomous regions -- Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni -- with a
central government in Baghdad. He called the Biden plan "the essence of
a nightmare feared by Iraqis."
"Not that any of Biden's proposals
will take effect, as the socio-political reality in Iraq is
undividable," he continued. "But Iraqis will pay dearly until Biden and
his camp are convinced that his 'theory' is inapplicable in Iraq."
In contrast, Robert Diamond, chairman of New York Veterans for Obama, penned a highly critical piece in the New York Daily News
taking issue with McCain's record on his support for veterans. Diamond
argues the image of McCain's concern for veterans issues is largely a
myth created by McCain himself:
As both an Iraq war veteran and a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy,
I am intimately familiar with John McCain's valiant and honorable
military service. McCain, as far as I am concerned, is a true American
hero. Unfortunately, his heroism in the Vietnam
War has been allowed to morph into a patently false "record" -
ceaselessly touted by his campaign - that McCain is a strong advocate
for veterans. That could not be further from the truth...
...The nation's largest Iraq veterans organization, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America,
a nonpartisan organization, grades members of Congress on how they vote
on legislation that "affect[s] troops, veterans or military families."
This includes votes on such issues as expanded health care services for
veterans and reservists, military death benefits, traumatic brain
injury research and adequate rest for service members between
deployments, just to name a few.
Of the 155 votes tracked by IAVA since 9/11, John McCain received a
grade of "D." While no senator earned a grade of "A," Barack Obama got
a "B ."
Words on Iraq by the candidates themselves still continue to
follow the same lines of reason and criticism. Writing on a Wall
Street Journal blog, Elizabeth Holmes described John McCain's appearance at the same National Guard convention at which Biden spoke.
During his speech McCain took the opportunity to combine the economy
and Iraq in order to highlight his opponent's lack of leadership:
“Whether it’s a reversal in war, or an economic emergency, he reacts as
a politician and not as a leader, seeking an advantage for himself
instead of a solution for his country.”
Later a spokesman for Obama was quoted striking back at McCain's words:
“John McCain is so out of touch that he wants to keep spending $10
billion a month in Iraq indefinitely while the Iraqi government sits on
a $79 billion surplus and our economy is in turmoil.”
More
-
David Botti
|
Sep 25, 2008 12:57 PM
Since the start of the Iraq war there's been a number of attempts to
relay the soldier/veteran experience through films both fictional and
documentary. Now comes Hollywood's latest production The Lucky Ones (trailer),
which stars Tim Robbins, Rachel McAdams, and Michael Pena as Iraq
veterans on a road trip across the United States. You could say making
this movie is somewhat of a bold move. In fact, a headline in Florida alt-weekly Creative Loafing reads: "Can The Lucky Ones
break the Iraq war-movie jinx?" Historically Iraq movies (and one TV
show) have done poorly, sometimes drawing criticism for the actual
storyline and other times falling victim to what some see as a general lack of interest among American moviegoers.
Movie critics have pointed to the fact Americans already see the war
everyday on the news (at least, for many years they did), and
fictionalized portrayals simply don't have the escapism movies can
provide. Then there's the over-saturation of political messages some
of the movies contained. Washington Times movie critic Christian Toto told NPR last year: "A lot of the critics of the more recent
films have said that the films are full of speeches, and it's very
obvious what the political angle is. And I think an artist, maybe if
he or she had some time to reflect on the material, may give a more
nuanced balanced performance."
Creative
Loafing's J.r. Jones took a brief look at the history of war movies
made soon after the wars they portrayed ended. He began with 1946's The Best Years of Our Lives, a truly amazing film following three veterans home from WWII
as they deal with alcoholism, family tensions, and their injuries. The
film was awarded eight Oscars. The post-Vietnam era saw the movies The Dear Hunter and Coming Home
receive critical acclaim and solid public interest. Then came Iraq
(and notice there really hasn't been any major film looking at the
Korean War, other than maybe the Manchurian Candidate -- but, that's a different story). Jones gave a solid history of Iraq movies up to this point:
Dramas about returning Iraq war veterans haven't received nearly so warm a welcome. The first, Irwin Winkler's Home of the Brave,
opened in New York and LA shortly before Christmas 2006 and was
released a little more widely the following summer, mostly near
military bases, but it quickly vanished. Clearly modeled on The Best Years of Our Lives,
it followed three soldiers as they tried to adjust to life in a country
that didn't want to think about them or the war they'd been fighting. I
wouldn't call it a knockout, but it had some powerful scenes,
particularly those involving Jessica Biel as a soldier who'd lost a
hand and was now forced to make do with a big, clumsy prosthesis
obviously designed for a man. Kimberly Peirce's Stop-Loss, an
MTV-produced drama about three young grunts returning from the war to
their stars-and-stripes Texas town, got a more respectful rollout from
Paramount Pictures this past March, but it flopped, grossing less than
half its $25 million production cost.
How The Lucky Ones does is anyone's guess at this point. The initial reviews aren't bad but they aren't great either. The Cleveland Plain Dealer had this to say:
"The Lucky Ones," co-writer/director Neil
Burger's credible if unremarkable follow-up to his
extraordinary "The Illusionist," refers to
soldiers returning from Iraq in one piece...What follows is a series of occasionally funny encounters,
as well as some soapy complications not so unpleasant as
they are predictable. There are the requisite moving
moments, too, making "The Lucky Ones" no more or
less noteworthy than the slew of war movies preceding it in
the last year or two.
An observation you'll see made in reviews of the movie is the
script's use of humor where other Iraq movies may have remained
humorless. The San Jose Mercury News weighs in on how this all works
out:
The film...has Iraq on its mind, though it never mentions
the word. It wants to make some kind of commentary on how the country
hasn't come to grips with the war or its veterans without taking the issue head-on. Perhaps
the director and his co-writer, Dirk Wittenborn ("Fierce People''),
thought a lighter, entertaining approach would work after so many
box-office failures about the war that were either dark thrillers or
dramas. But the contrived and convoluted plot of "The Lucky Ones''
eventually undermines any serious intentions.
Here are a few links to other movies/TV shows about the Iraq war:
Rendition
In the Valley of Elah
Redacted
Over There (TV)
Home of the Brave
Stop-Loss
Generation Kill (TV miniseries)
More
-
David Botti
|
Jul 16, 2008 07:02 PM
For the next several weeks I'll be blogging as an embed with various
U.S. military units operating in Iraq (posts will come as Internet is
available). As you may know from reading this blog, I was a Marine in
Iraq during the 2003 invasion and left later that summer as my
battalion rotated home. I haven't been back to the country until
earlier this week when I landed in Baghdad in the belly of a C-130
cargo plane, this time as a reporter.
The
moment the back ramp of the aircraft opened and a hot wind blew across
the dusty tarmac, I was prepared to begin comparing today's Iraq to my
own experiences in the country five years earlier. The truth is,
however, that after five years this is essentially a different country
and a different war. The differences are so obvious that they hardly
seem worth mentioning, and I'll need time to fully comprehend that I've
returned to a country I never thought I'd set foot in again.

A Marine patrol at sunset in An Nasiriyah, August 2003 / Photo: David Botti
Before
a few days ago, my time in Iraq existed as a defining moment of my
life--a time now frozen in photographs and memories that are already
beginning to fade. I do remember, however, how I once viewed those
soldiers and marines entering the country as I prepared to leave. I
pitied them in some respects. They'd missed the historic events of the
invasion, and were now left to "clean up" what little there was left to
do. Of course, I couldn't have been more wrong.
Now I've come to Iraq again at a time when many here point to the relative calm that's come over the country. A recent graphic in The New York Times
illustrated how the statistics break down over the years. The number of
U.S. troops killed, for example, fell from 126 in May 2007 to 19 in May
2008.
I've
been in Baghdad for two days and have yet to hear a burst of gunfire,
or the explosion from a rocket. The large-scale violence I was
expecting suddenly seems to have disappeared -- albeit perhaps only for
a temporary time. After all, I left the city of An Nasiriyah in the
middle of the night five years ago, sitting on a pile of camouflage
netting in the back of an open truck. I entered Baghdad early this
morning in a convoy of armored "Rhino" buses.
Perhaps that's one comparison worth noting from the start.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 23, 2008 04:58 PM
Just a quick note to let you know the White House gave word today of a
new Medal of Honor recipient. Nineteen-year-old Army Pfc. Ross
McGinnis was killed in late-2006 when he jumped on a grenade to save
his comrades. From the Associated Press:
McGinnis was perched in the gunner's hatch of a Humvee when a grenade
sailed past him and into the truck where four other soldiers sat. He
shouted a warning to the others, then jumped on the grenade. The
grenade, which was lodged near the vehicle's radio, blew up and killed
him.
McGinnis is the fourth service member to received the Medal of Honor for service in Iraq.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 22, 2008 11:25 AM
The army announced yesterday that the practice of "stop-loss," where a
solider is held past his/her enlistment contract, should continue for
at least another year. While military leaders are making efforts to
reduce combat tour lengths, and increase the size of the army, the Associated Press reports
there are roughly 12,000 soldiers serving under the stop-loss. The
numbers break down to: "6,800 active-duty Army, about 3,800 in the Army
National Guard and close to 1,500 in the Reserves."
USA Today breaks down the numbers even further, putting the latest stop-loss news into a wider historical context:
-In May 2007 the practice of stop-loss reached a three-year low of 8,540.
-"Since then, the number of soldiers forced to remain in the Army rose 43% to 12,235 in March."
-"Soldiers affected by stop loss now serve, on average, an extra 6.6
months...Key leaders at the
small-unit level — sergeants through sergeants first class — make up
45% of those soldiers. Soldiers typically enlist for four-year stints."
-58,300 soldiers have been affected by the stop-loss since 2002.
People have often asked me what exactly a stop-loss is --
especially after they hear it referred to as the "back door draft."
First, USA Today offers this concise summary of how the army views the
policy: "Stop loss can keep a soldier in the service if his or her unit
deploys
within 90 days of the end of the soldier's commitment. It is necessary,
the Army says, to maintain the integrity of units headed to war."
Second,
I sometimes use the example of my own unit on the eve of the invasion
into Iraq back in 2003. Most of us in my reserve unit enlisted under a
six-year contract. That meant that for six years were would actively
train with our home unit, and be subject to mobilizations if ordered by
the president. Afterwards, we would spend two years in the Inactive
Ready Reserve (IRR) during which time we would not train, but would
still "be on the books," in case the military needed more troops.
In
March 2003, when my unit got word it was heading to Iraq, a number of
marines were reaching the end of their six-year contract. Depending on
how long we stayed in Iraq, their contract might end while they were
over there. It was these marines who were subject to stop-loss. They
were senior members of the unit whose experience would be invaluable
during the deployment, and our company would be hurt if our numbers
decreased. So, they stayed and deployed with us; then left the
military after returning home.
Most did not complain about
serving past their enlistment contract. Their buddies were going to
war, and the stop-loss marines wanted to go with them -- and, at that
point, the war was still new. Many felt they'd miss out on a major
historical event that would go down in the history books. But, times
have changed, and the war is more than five years old. As James
Martin, a social work professor at Bryn Mawr College and retired Army
colonel, told USA Today: "These are the guys who bear the brunt of it.
They just get put back into the grinder continually."
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 9, 2008 10:09 AM
Since the start of the Iraq war, the importance and viability of
military blogs has stirred up tremendous debate. There have been
issues of military censorship, journalistic viability, and ethical
dilemmas. Recently, talk of where (and how) military blogs fit into
the war's narrative has seemed to intensify to some degree. Here's a
look at what's happening:
The Columbia Journalism Review published a lengthy article in its last issue profiling Bill Roggio, a U.S.-based military blogger who's set up his own media operation
aimed at reporting on terrorism and "small wars" beyond what the
mainstream media can do. Before the piece gets to Roggio, the intro
takes a look at the gap military blogs aim to fill:
When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, among the
seven-hundred-odd journalists who embedded with combat units were few
who were familiar with the military in any intimate way. To many
critics, especially those with military experience, this revealed
itself in the press’s coverage of the war, which they felt often missed
the mark when it came to explaining the hows and the whys of the fight,
as well as the mundane realities of military life and culture.
Army veteran Roggio first started blogging about the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan to put the events in perspective for his family. But, as
CJR notes, a transformation took place that's changed the way Roggio
operates—and underscores the significance these blogs can have:
It was during the second battle for Fallujah in November 2004,
however, that he began to focus his effort. He had been posting
detailed battle maps of Iraq’s Anbar province on his site, showing
where Marine and Army units were meeting the stiffest resistance from
insurgent groups who harassed them with roadside bombs and the
occasional ambush. In the spring of 2005, a new group of readers began logging on to
Roggio’s site. The Marines in Anbar province were embroiled in a deadly
game of cat-and-mouse, and looking for any tactical advantage they
could find. Officers with the Regimental Combat Team 2 discovered
Roggio’s site and began using it as an information source, calling his
site the “Command Chronology of Western Iraq.”
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 2, 2008 10:36 AM
A reader recently pointed me to an incredibly detailed interactive map
indicating the hometowns of U.S. military casualties from Operations
Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Based on information available from
the Department of Defense, the map's creator has allowed viewers to
filter the map by branch of service, military operation, sex, and age. Check it out here. It first appears zoomed in on the New York City area, but one can view anywhere in the country.
From the Website's mission statement:
In mid 2007 oobgolf.com launched an advanced golf course finder for our users. We recently made the decision
to use that same technology and development resources to map the hometowns of soldiers who have died in
Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.
This was not done as a political statement. We simply felt that this tool provided a unique way for Americans
to connect to these fallen soldiers in a new more personal way.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 21, 2008 12:38 PM
Earlier this week I posted excerpts from I journal
I kept while serving in Iraq. During this fifth anniversary week of the
war, I wanted to give readers a sense of what it was like preparing to
deploy. Today I'm posting a few more entries from the journal. They all
take place while I was at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, waiting to see
if/when we'd get the call to deploy.
March 23, 2003
A
Sunday afternoon on the barracks' catwalk. Day four of the war. Nothing
much else to do but bullsh*t and watch TV. There are an estimated 50
Marine casualties at this point. Mom said she watched a firefight on TV
this morning. Some U.S. forces are less than 100 miles from Baghdad.
Other than that don't know what else to say...just waiting. A lot of us
think that we'll end up going no where, just end up staying stateside.
I don't believe that, I just hope we don't go somewhere for some bull*t
mission. If we do something good I know I'll feel as though I've
accomplished something worthwhile in my 23 years.
Things just
get more surreal by the hour. First, we watched more footage of the
front lines where Marines were fighting. These guys are just like us,
it's so obvious but I just can't get my head around it. At one point
the reporter mentioned he was with the 2nd Battalion 8th Marines--and
we're staying in their barracks right now. It's getting more
frustrating to see Marines dying and not being able to help them. Sgt.
D- speculates that our leave date for Iraq might come sooner. He also
says when we get there we'll probably wish for these long nights back
in the U.S. Funny, because he's never talked like that before.
March 24, 2003
Not
much to say except that today I realized I could actually die. I mean I
see vivid pictures of such things, and I see how easily this can happen
in war. It may seem like an obvious statement. I thought about these
kinds of things the moment I enlisted. But never in those early,
innocent, "good ol' days" when I rushed through weekend training to get
back to school and finish my homework, did I ever think I'd be in a
war. Then, once this became apparent, it has taken until now to really
understand what war actually means...I mean, really means. It doesn't
seem like me, David Botti, could be shot to death on a road in
Iraq...but, it can so easily happen. So easy to become a name on the
wall, and a cross in Arlington Nation Cemetery where thousands like me
may have thought the same things. But I shouldn't think about such
morbid things. The war is getting bloodier...especially for the
Marines. Today I saw an Army convoy come under attack on TV.
March 25, 2003
Things
have changed infinitely in a matter of a few hours. We learned today
that we would be leaving for Kuwait by the weekend. Things kicked into
high gear. The mood seems somber, uncertain, worried. Things are so
real and so clear that it seems everyday the fog lifts revealing how
things will really be. I could see it in the major's face as he told us
we were going. Here are people's thoughts: H- is having trouble
sleeping; B- is worried that he'll kill someone and go to hell; S-
wishes he picked up a slutty girl last weekend; A- doesn't feel like
talking to his parents (he also thinks he only has a 20 percent chance
of coming home not wounded or dead); C- wants to go but is scared at
the same time; N- is nervous. All I can really do is concentrate on the
future, and put all this into perspective when I come back home.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 19, 2008 09:13 AM
Along with the Iraq war starting five years ago this week, this
period was also the first time I began writing in the journal I kept
while deployed. I'm posting excerpts today and tomorrow, so you can
get a sense of what was going through the mind of a lowly lance
corporal on his way to Iraq. The entries are not particularly
eloquent, but they're real and I hope they just show what the calm was
like before the storm. I've omitted the names of my fellow Marines for
their privacy.
March 10, 2003
Our platoon commander has been
having meetings with all the squad leaders (planning and training
stuff), and it sounds like we're going balls to the wall. He says if
we're going to the front we're dropping everything, and taking only
food and ammo. Morale seems relatively high -- probably from the
adventure factor. Sounds like we may be in Kuwait within 10 days if
the training schedule at Camp Lejeune doesn't get lengthened.
We
got a slightly propaganda-ish Iraq country briefing, and one on desert
survival. In terms of politics in the world I'm loosing track of all
those resolutions, votes, "phone calls," etc. I just want to get over
there. I've also realized I haven't thought about the future much.
Hopefully, I'll be too busy to think about it. I wonder what they're
doing back home right now. Is it wrong of me to think that I feel
almost lucky to be in this position, to see some facet of the world
which is rare -- and then have the ability to come home and bring those
experiences with me? Well -- we'll see what kinds of experiences I
actually take home...if I want them with me. A- isn't sure if he wants
to go back to school after our deployment. He said he's not afraid of
what's ahead of us, but that he's afraid of what it'll be like going
back home. He looks at other college students w/o a clue as to what's
going on, and gets pissed off. B- said he always just wanted to work as
a bureaucrat, and that because of this he doesn't want anything to do
with that kind of work. He just wants to "go west" when we get back,
and figure everything else later.
March 11, 2003
There
are rumors today we may be at Camp Lejeune for two months. I can't
stand that thought of not being able to go overseas when the war's
still going on.
K- got his family hardship exemption today, so
he won't be coming with us. Some in the platoon say it's a bad omen --
that that goofy bast*rd was our good luck charm.
A bunch of us
went to Ruby Tuesday's at the mall last night. C- showed up with his fiancée. I feel bad for those two now that we're leaving. It just
doesn't seem fair to any of us.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 17, 2008 09:13 AM
he fifth anniversary of the Iraq war is about to come upon us, and so too will an endless amount of media coverage on the issue. Later in the week I'll be writing up some personal reflections on the anniversary, but today I've compiled some of the better anniversary stories that have already popped up. First, take a look at NEWSWEEK's in-depth look at where the Army stands (plus these great video interviews with soldiers now in Iraq), and then see below for how other stories address the past five years.
On Sunday The New York Times gave former Baghdad bureau chief John F. Burns a few column inches to give his take on where the war has taken us. Burns penned this article at the war's outset which I've always considered to be an amazing piece of journalism. For Sunday's article, Burns, who spent five years in Iraq, reflects on his position as a journalist covering he war, and on the larger meaning for both the U.S. and Iraq. As his opening line puts it ("Five years on, it seems positively surreal"), Burns seems in awe of the course the war has taken; and frustrated over miscalculations that occurred. He writes of watching the first U.S. air strikes from a Baghdad roof:
...from that first impact, among many on the roof, the mood was scarcely one of cool detachment, or at least not as cautioned as it might have been by the longer-term implications of what we were seeing. Part of it, no doubt, was the air show — the sheer, astonishing, overwhelming demonstration of power, more like an act of God than man, unleashing in those watching from the roof something approaching awe.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 13, 2008 11:11 AM
Here's a quick breakdown of the new Pew Research Center Study
that finds the media and public are loosing sight of the war. If you
read this blog, I assume you're not one of them. But here are the
numbers anyway:
- 28% of the public is aware that nearly 4,000 troops have been killed in Iraq over the past five years.
- Nearly 50% think the number of U.S. deaths is 3,000 or fewer.
- 23% of the public think the number of U.S. deaths is higher than 4,000.
- In earlier surveys nearly half of the respondents recalled the correct number of deaths.
- In 2007 the median of Iraq-associated news stories was 15% of all news stories.
- During the last week in January, 36% of those surveyed said they
were most closely following campaign news; 14% the stock market; 12%
the death of Heath Ledger; and 6% the war in Iraq.
- And, as the Associated Press quotes the survey director: "All education levels in the recent survey were similarly uninformed."
The LA Times posts a photo slide show from the 2003 invasion
next to their summary of the Pew survey. Whether they were trying to be
ironic or not, you might want to take a short trip back to that time; a
time when you couldn't get the war off of the TV.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 11, 2008 01:03 PM
Thirty-seven years after John Kerry and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War
(VVAW) descended upon Washington, D.C. to protest against U.S.
atrocities in Vietnam, a new generation of veterans will do the same
later this week. The group Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) is
heading to the Capital as part of an event called Winter Soldier: Iraq
& Afghanistan, named after the similar VVAW event four decades
ago. As IVAW puts it:
The four-day event will bring together veterans from across the country
to testify about their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan - and
present video and photographic evidence. In addition, there will be
panels of scholars, veterans, journalists, and other specialists to
give context to the testimony. These panels will cover everything from
the history of the GI resistance movement to the fight for veterans'
health benefits and support.
There
hasn't been much U.S. press coverage on the event, but the UK's Sunday
Times, using the headline of "Patriot Missiles," had a lengthy magazine story on the subject:
The veterans are not against the military and seek not to indict it – instead
they seek to shine a light on the bigger picture: that the Abu Ghraib prison
regime and the Haditha massacre of innocent Iraqis are not isolated
incidents perpetrated by “bad seeds” as the military suggests, but evidence
of an endemic problem. They will say they were tasked to do terrible things
and point the finger up the chain of command, which ignores, diminishes or
covers up routine abuse and atrocities.
Other
veterans, and vet bloggers, aren't thrilled with this event. A group
called "Stop the Slander," described as a "coalition of concerned
veterans, family members, and friends," has even published a guide for reporter's covering IVAW.
The guide warns journalists that claims made by IVAW may be untrue.
The guide even provides an acronym to follow of questions to ask:
D: Date(s) – When did the incident occur?
U: Unit(s) – What military units were involved?
P: Personnel – What are the names of the participants and witnesses?
E: Event(s) – What exactly happened exactly where?
S:
Signature(s) – Was this reported at the time or later and were reports,
affidavits or depositions signed, or will they now be signed?
Veterans For Freedom blogger, Mark Seavey, took his own critical look at the IVAW's preparations
for the Winter Soldier event, but in the end wrote that both sides of
the debate should be heard -- without unnecessary contest or debate:
I think it speaks well of IVAW that they expect all testimony to be
true and verifiable. And there will plenty of eyes there to ensure
that. Hopefully we can all say our piece, discuss our views and then
go home with no violence on anyone’s part.
The term "Winter Soldier" is derived from Thomas Paine's passage
intended to motivate George Washington's troops suffering at Valley
Forge:
“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and
sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his
country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man
and woman.”
This
is generating a huge amount of debate within the vocal veterans
community. What's interesting to note is that perhaps the only
demographic who can debate IVAW, without being called-out on their lack
of service, is other veterans. The issues goes above someone's service
record, and shows how the fabled, and perhaps cliched, military bond
can only go so far in such times of controversy. Or, is it still
there, above all the ruckus? We'll soon find out.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 10, 2008 01:01 PM
The New York Times Baghdad blog posted a moving account from an Iraq employee of the paper writing of his close friend's death as the victim took an evening stroll with his wife. Even though my blog is about U.S. troops and veterans, I posted this passage...
More